This might be true of art in general, but it’s video game graphics that keep reminding me of it. Chasing realism is an expensive luxury. Unless realism is a core part of whatever you’re trying to make, it’s probably not worth fixating on it. That’s because…
Like a clown car, but with less comedy and more violent death.
War movies, in my mind, must tread a very fine line in order for me to consider them good. I prefer for them to leave out bombast and propaganda, and I dislike seeing filmmakers pretty up what I regard as a fundamentally brutal and painful exercise in destroying human life. To quote Robert E. Lee, “It is well that war is so terrible, otherwise we should grow too fond of it.” I don’t feel comfortable with anything that purports to show real life also showing war as a ‘good’ thing. At the very least, it should be problematic and leave you feeling conflicted. The problem, of course, is that if the film doesn’t also tell an engaging story few will go and see it.
I also recognize that I have very different expectations and desires for what I’ll call “action movies,” and I’m somehow more ok with an action film showing combat and war in a more glamorous or unrealistic light. The recent A-Team movie, for example, totally ignores many of the realities of war and combat (and physics), and I was ok with that. Some old WWII movies (like Where Eagles Dare) fall into the same category, though they seem to do a far worse job of overtly signaling their lack of contact with reality.
When I saw it, I wasn’t entirely sure where Fury stood with regards to this distinction between ‘war’ and ‘action,’ and that left me uncertain of how I should feel. As you might guess by the title of this post, much of the movie delivers an intensely traumatic view of the war… no, that’s not quite it: the movie follows a group of men who have been as traumatized by the war as seems possible, without having them break. Even that may be pushing it, since the men certainly seem broken when you look at them more closely. They’re just still able to do their job, which is killing others before others can kill them. This, in my mind, is part of what makes it such a good war movie. But I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention that Fury does have an odd change in tone at one point. It’s almost as though it consciously tries to straddle the divide between ‘war’ and ‘action,’ and suffers for it. This doesn’t make it a bad movie, but like I said above, it does leave me less certain of how I should feel. I’ll give you more about this (and some other non-spoilery things) after the break.