Happy New Year!
Here’s an abbreviated dungeon-starter for Dungeon World, building somewhat on the material that I came up with for The Duke’s Men. Agenda, Goals, and Dungeon Moves are at the top as per usual. This is mostly focused on cultists and such, as the game itself was, but the basic storyline offered in my previous post could easily be altered to deal with any number of different kinds of threats.
A few days ago, I ran a game of DungeonWorld for two of my friends. It went so well, and ended up feeling so much like a classic Dungeons & Dragons adventure, that I thought I would share the basics of the game with you. It’s somewhere between an actual play and a scenario description. I’ll put up an honest-to-goodness Dungeon-starter soon, and with a little creativity you should have an easy time converting it into your own single- or double-episode game.
We didn’t look too closely at the backstories of our heroes, but please allow me to introduce you to the adventures of Kate the thief and Jonah the ranger (and Jonah’s wolfhound, Erasmus), the loyal representatives of Duke Blackforest. What follows should allow you to live out their adventures for yourself, or change things slightly and experience the adventure anew with other people.
I read this book in halting installments; not because I couldn’t get through it quickly, but because I read each section as it became available, starting two months before its ostensible publishing date. I don’t know whether that says more about the book or about my love for the series started by Eric Flint‘s 1632. I can say that I would certainly recommend this one to anyone else who has enjoyed the previous books in the series. Read on past the break to find my more nuanced thoughts on Iver Cooper‘s 1636: Seas of Fortune.
Have you seen this movie? No? You may wish to reconsider your life choices. At least insofar as they involve watching or not watching Safety Not Guaranteed.
How would you react to someone who told you that they could and had built a time machine? What if they told you that they had used one once before?
That’s what this movie is all about. It tells the story of a young woman working as an intern at a Seattle magazine; it follows her travails as she tries to learn just how crazy the person who posted the above classified ad actually is. And somehow, in the course of a wandering storyline that nearly lost me at a few points, Safety Not Guaranteed absolutely stole my heart. It’s been about a year since I watched it, and the movie still sticks with me as an excellent example of how you can make a great movie with a fairly low budget and a healthy dose of creativity.
We interrupt our normal programming to bring you more news of pretty things that my friends are making. My sometime-housemate Kyle Perler is an awesome photographer, and he has recently created a Kickstarter project to fund a photo-trip to Africa. He’s aiming to make a book from the photos that he takes on this trip, focusing on the landscape and wildlife of Africa, but the really cool thing that he’s offering is access to a travel blog with all the pictures that he takes.
He’s planning to, amongst other things, go on safari and go bird-watching. He’s already been catching photos like this one:
If you like pretty pictures, or just really awesome photos, check out his project. You might also look up some of his other work. I strongly recommend looking through some of his galleries there, especially the “Fine Art” one. His portraits are also totally worth a look. It’s great having talented friends.
Jennifer’s Body deserves more attention. You should definitely watch Jennifer’s Body. I give up: there’s almost no way that I can talk about this movie without sounding like a creeper. Watching Jennifer’s Body is a refreshing experience, as the movie takes a jaunty and semi-upbeat stroll through the teenage monster movie genre. Though the movies are quite different, I wasn’t that surprised to learn that Jennifer’s Body was made by the same crew that made Juno. Rather than dealing with teenage pregnancy, this movie tells the story of two best friends, and the bloody end of their friendship; we’re given a front row seat to the narrator’s transformation from a sweet, self-assured, but largely unassuming young woman into someone driven to extremes by violence, danger, necessity, and isolation, certain of the importance of her actions despite knowing that no one will believe her. Contrary to the claims of most critics (and even some audiences, since the movie was panned by Rottentomatoes and IMDb), I think the film is quite good. Perhaps you’d care to find out why?
I love S.M. Stirling‘s Change series. I enjoyed the first trilogy, seeing people pulling together despite incredible adversity after the collapse of civilization as we know it, and I enjoyed the later transition to a more classical epic and mystical fantasy adventure with post-apocalyptic trappings. But I did not like how slowly the story moved along in the later books. I’ll do my best not to spoil anything, but once you get close to the end of the second Change series you’ll understand what I mean; Stirling’s story doesn’t move quite as slowly or impenetrably as Jordan‘s Wheel of Time once did, but the comparison of pace is almost appropriate. Despite the trudging sense of gradual story progress, I still really liked the story that was being told. And I’ll freely admit that Stirling at least made good use of the pace to lay the foundation for elaborate and interesting future story developments and character interactions.
All of this is meant by way of comparison: after the previous few books in the series, The Given Sacrifice moves like lightning. The characters forge ahead at full speed, even as nearly all of their previous adventures are called back to our attention in a rapid-fire barrage that just helps to anchor our sense of the heroes’ earlier accomplishments. And the second half of the book seems to move faster than that, if that’s even possible. I almost felt as though I’d gotten plot-whiplash. It was actually rather refreshing to find things moving so quickly, though what I’d like most is if Stirling could perhaps find some sort of middle ground in his next few books. In the end, despite the sudden change of pace, I have to say that this was a fitting and good finish to its section of the series. More on why after the break.
Remember how I mentioned that I would tell you about Dominions 3? Today is your lucky day. First off, here is what I said last time:
Dominions 3 looks like someone fell in love with Master of Magic and then decided that it wasn’t nearly complex enough. And that it needed more gods, wars, and magic. At a glance, it looks like something that will most appeal to a certain core of strategy lovers, but the concept is absolutely wonderful regardless of your interest in the genre. You play a god rushing to fill the gap left by the disappearance / death of The Old God, and you must expand to outdo all the other pretenders and secure your own position. It has territory based command and control, resource management, spell research, a military focus, and more numbers than you can shake a stick at. Several of my friends are very excited about it, and I’ll let you know more when I’ve played it for a bit. If it is more accessible than I anticipate, I will do my best to proselytize and spread the good word of the new god, Dominions 3.
That sounds pretty exciting, doesn’t it.
Have you read any of Naomi Novik‘s Temeraire series? No? Sit down and treat yourself to the first one, His Majesty’s Dragon. You’ll stumble in surprise as you read the first few pages, only to find yourself running, tearing through chapters until you’ve finished the first book before you even truly realize you’d begun it. The series is a mad combination of the geniuses of C.S. Forester, Patrick O’Brian, and Jane Austen, and is studded throughout with the strangely fitting addition of dragons. I found it too odd to pass up, and then too good to put down. Blood of Tyrants is an excellent continuation of the series.
HEIMDALL!
Right. Now that I’ve gotten my oddly compulsive enthusiasm for Heimdall out of the way, I can get on with reviewing this movie.
Thor 2 may be one of those cases of too much of a good thing; I love it so much that I’m really not sure where to start talking about it. All I can tell you is that I cackled repeatedly in the theatre despite being surrounded by strangers, and that I would happily see it again soon (though preferably without paying through the nose for my tickets, thank you very much Loews Boston Common).
I haven’t had this much fun in a movie theatre since I went to see The Avengers. Heck, I think Thor 2 might be even more fun than The Avengers, though they’re competing in different categories. See, The Avengers is one of the serious episodes of the superhero series, while the Thor movies are the comedic relief. They have their serious moments of course, but it seems like everyone involved recognized the first movie’s comedic potential and decided to run with it for Thor 2. And holy shit did they ever succeed.
On that note, I, um, have to have another shout out:
Darcy sizes you up for her next laser-guided comedic strike.
Darcy is hilarious. I don’t want to spoil anything, but do you recall how she totally stole the spotlight in the first movie? I hardly paid any attention to poor Natalie Portman in the first Thor, despite the fact that I usually love her characters. I think Natalie Portman’s Jane Foster got far more attention this time through, which was good, but you should still keep your eyes on Kat Denning’s Darcy. Every scene that she was in became funnier, just by virtue her presence. She was flat-out one of my favorite characters, and her simultaneously accepting and no-nonsense reactions to all of the truly ridiculous things going on around her only made her scenes better.
I’m a little worried to be talking too much about this movie. I seriously don’t want to give anything away. It’s everything that I had hoped for from a superhero movie, and it does it all with a particular attention to dramatic comedy that will leave you with a grin plastered to your face. It is an unapologetic superhero flick in high form, and (as I’ve come to expect from Marvel’s tightly woven movie universe) sets up perfectly for more fun and excitement in the future.
Now, before I go on to talk about things that might be considered spoilers, I just have to say: stay for both of the post-credit sequences. As with Avengers, there are two of them. Oh, and if you want to read someone else’s excellent take on why Darcy is so cool, check this out.
Right, so here there be *SPOILERS*.
I’m not actually going to say very much. What I really wanted to talk about was the fact that they managed to find an excuse that let them have a climactic set piece battle with callbacks to other previous challenges faced by Thor. I thought that that was very cleverly done, and I was glowing with admiration from one storyteller to another for how they had managed it. Could they have done more with it? Probably. Did they need to? Not at all. It was wonderfully done as it was.
Oh, also, my overweening enthusiasm for Heimdall was well and truly paid off in this film. I liked him in the first film because I thought he was simply cool. His actions in the the second movie cemented my impression of him, given his careful maneuvering of his obligations to simultaneously do what he saw as necessary and right while still maintaining his loyalty to Asgard. Who would have thought that I would like someone so stoic and terse? Oh, right, everyone who’s seen me watch a Spaghetti Western.
Watch this movie. If you’ve ever been at all tempted by a superhero story, it’s truly a treat.
Fistful of Wits 